From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-71513-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8967 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2010 20:53:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 8958 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Mar 2010 20:53:13 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-vw0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-vw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.212.41)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:53:09 +0000
Received: by vws20 with SMTP id 20so5427639vws.0         for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.90.201 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201003281746.59570.pedro@codesourcery.com>
References: <20100304180219.GA10826@intel.com> 	 <201003280855.44473.pedro@codesourcery.com> 	 <20100328164045.GB5815@caradoc.them.org> 	 <201003281746.59570.pedro@codesourcery.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:53:00 -0000
Received: by 10.220.107.21 with SMTP id z21mr1965954vco.77.1269809587876; Sun,  	28 Mar 2010 13:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <6dc9ffc81003281353m11e317f0odc8de38d8ea6f5cf@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: 6/6 [2nd try]: Add AVX support (gdbserver changes)
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00958.txt.bz2

On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Sunday 28 March 2010 17:40:45, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>> You're right. =A0I forgot about this; the design won't work.
>>
>> Would "xmlRegisters=3Darm,x86" be a better solution?
>
> Yes, I think so.
>
>> If so, the way to implement that is to have a registration function.
>> i386-tdep.c:_initialize_i386_tdep can call a function in remote.c
>> to add "x86" to the list of xmlRegisters architectures.
>
> Sounds good to me.

A patch is posted at

http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-03/msg00957.html


--=20
H.J.