From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To: Hui Li <lihui@loongson.cn>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb: LoongArch: Change LOONGARCH_LINUX_NUM_GREGSET to 35
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:06:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <704078b1-cb70-4b13-a721-0fed502db160@FreeBSD.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab2e633a-12fe-9246-cf4b-e399a31dd076@loongson.cn>
On 2/26/24 5:25 PM, Hui Li wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2024/2/23 上午8:33, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On 2/20/24 6:14 PM, Hui Li wrote:
>>> There is an assertion error "gdb_assert (n < tdesc->reg_defs.size ())"
>>> in find_register_by_number() when gdb connects to gdbserver, this is
>>> because the value of LOONGARCH_LINUX_NUM_GREGSET (45, which contains 10
>>> reserved regs) is different with the number of regs (35) in the feature
>>> file gdb/features/loongarch/base64.xml. Change
>>> LOONGARCH_LINUX_NUM_GREGSET
>>> to 35 to keep consistent with the xml file.
>>>
>>> without this patch:
>>>
>>> Execute on the target machine:
>>>
>>> $ gdbserver 192.168.1.123:5678 ./test
>>>
>>> Execute on host machine:
>>>
>>> $ gdb ./test
>>> (gdb) target remote 192.168.1.123:5678
>>>
>>> Output on the target machine:
>>>
>>> Process ./test created; pid = 67683
>>> Listening on port 5678
>>> Remote debugging from host 192.168.1.136, port 6789
>>> gdbserver/regcache.cc:205: A problem internal to GDBserver has been
>>> detected.
>>> find_register_by_number: Assertion 'n < tdesc->reg_defs.size ()'
>>> failed.
>>>
>>> Output on host machine:
>>>
>>> Remote debugging using 192.168.1.123:5678
>>> Remote connection closed
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hui Li <lihui@loongson.cn>
>>> ---
>>> gdb/arch/loongarch.h | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gdb/arch/loongarch.h b/gdb/arch/loongarch.h
>>> index 4b7ab054ea0..6e51e1d097b 100644
>>> --- a/gdb/arch/loongarch.h
>>> +++ b/gdb/arch/loongarch.h
>>> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ enum loongarch_regnum
>>> LOONGARCH_ORIG_A0_REGNUM = 32, /* Syscall's original arg0. */
>>> LOONGARCH_PC_REGNUM = 33, /* Program Counter. */
>>> LOONGARCH_BADV_REGNUM = 34, /* Bad Vaddr for Addressing
>>> Exception. */
>>> - LOONGARCH_LINUX_NUM_GREGSET = 45, /* 32 GPR, ORIG_A0, PC, BADV,
>>> RESERVED 10. */
>>> + LOONGARCH_LINUX_NUM_GREGSET = 35, /* 32 GPR, ORIG_A0, PC, BADV. */
>>> LOONGARCH_ARG_REGNUM = 8, /* r4-r11: general-purpose
>>> argument registers.
>>> f0-f7: floating-point argument registers. */
>>> LOONGARCH_FIRST_FP_REGNUM = LOONGARCH_LINUX_NUM_GREGSET,
>>
>> Does anything depend on the gap being present here for FIRST_FP_REGNUM?
>> That is,
>> should you perhaps be moving the +10 down to LOONGARCH_FIRST_FP_REGNUM
>> to keep the
>> first FP register number the same?
>>
>
> Thanks for your review.
>
> The purpose of this modification is to make LOONGARCH_FIRST_FP_REGNUM
> equal to 35. In gdb and gdbserver code, tdesc reg number is defined
> according to the feature file gdb/features/loongarch/*.xml(GPR: 0 ~ 34,
> and FPR starts at 35). But first FPR reg number in regcache is
> LOONGARCH_FIRST_FP_REGNUM(45), the total number of registers will not be
> consistent with tdesc reg numbers.
>
> With this patch, LOONGARCH_FIRST_FP_REGNUM is changed to 35,
> the 10 reserved registers are not included in total number of registers,
> then all the reg numbers in regcache are consistent with tdesc reg numbers.
>
> I send v2 version with modified code and commit message to make this
> change clearer.
Ok. Mostly I was curious if there were existing stubs/servers that do not
use the XML descriptions and assume that the first FP register is at
register 45.
That said, GDB should also be able to handle a different numbering from the
remote target that doesn't match the regcache numbers and instead translates
remote register numbers to regcache register numbers.
--
John Baldwin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-27 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-21 2:14 Hui Li
2024-02-23 0:33 ` John Baldwin
2024-02-27 1:25 ` Hui Li
2024-02-27 23:06 ` John Baldwin [this message]
2024-03-01 4:16 ` Hui Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=704078b1-cb70-4b13-a721-0fed502db160@FreeBSD.org \
--to=jhb@freebsd.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=lihui@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).