From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 51812 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2020 19:32:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 51804 invoked by uid 89); 4 Mar 2020 19:32:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*M:5d11 X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 19:32:52 +0000 Received: from [172.16.0.95] (192-222-181-218.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.181.218]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A49BF1E508; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 14:32:50 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Implement debugging of WOW64 processes To: Hannes Domani , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20200304191632.14947-1-ssbssa.ref@yahoo.de> <20200304191632.14947-1-ssbssa@yahoo.de> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <711a3001-da27-4400-5d11-93ed14e503f2@simark.ca> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 19:32:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200304191632.14947-1-ssbssa@yahoo.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2020-03/txt/msg00096.txt On 2020-03-04 2:16 p.m., Hannes Domani via gdb-patches wrote: > @@ -99,7 +99,5 @@ void _initialize_amd64_windows_nat (); > void > _initialize_amd64_windows_nat () > { > - windows_set_context_register_offsets (mappings); > - windows_set_segment_register_p (amd64_windows_segment_register_p); > x86_set_debug_register_length (8); > } Does x86_set_debug_register_length need to be adjusted based on the type of the process? With the current code, it will be set to 8 even if debugging a WOW64 process, is that what we want? Simon