From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 117AE3987C09 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 01:03:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 117AE3987C09 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.11] (173-246-6-90.qc.cable.ebox.net [173.246.6.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A495DF8001; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 21:03:41 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: GDB 10.1 release -- 2020-09-18 Update To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20200918234602.GA4674@adacore.com> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <72a2558b-bcad-ecd9-7311-b3ef799ccfd8@simark.ca> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 21:03:41 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200918234602.GA4674@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 01:03:44 -0000 On 2020-09-18 7:46 p.m., Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hello, > > A quick update on the release status since the 10.0.90 pre-release > was published last Saturday... > > So far, we don't have anything really worrisome that could significantly > delay the release. I'll try to find some time to test the gnulib patches > that Eli pointed out next week. I just filed this ("TUI focus behavior change"), if it's considered a bug then I think it should be put on the list of blockers. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26638 Simon