From: David Taylor <dtaylor@usendtaylorx2l.lss.emc.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: RFA: info macro [-at LOCATION,]
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7612.1415714475@usendtaylorx2l> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83mw7ymmdw.fsf@gnu.org>
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> > From: David Taylor <dtaylor@emc.com>
> > Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:41:33 -0500
> >
> > A few releases ago it was possible to set a location that would be used
> > by 'info location' by typing something like:
> >
> > list file.c:42
> >
> > and then do:
> >
> > info macro MACRONAME
> >
> > . Sometime between release 7.1 and 7.8 that stopped working.
> >
> > The following patch adds the option [-at LOCATION,] to 'info macro' to
> > enable the use of a user selected location as a documented feature.
> >
> > Three files, three change log entries:
>
> Thanks. I think this warrants a NEWS entry as well.
Thanks. How are diffs for NEWS handled? For the text, how about:
* New options
The info macro command now takes an optional location ([-at LOCATION,])
for determining which definition, if any, of the macro is in scope. If
left unspecified it, as before, uses the source and line associated with
the current program counter.
> > gdb/doc/ChangeLog:
> >
> > 2014-11-10 David Taylor <dtaylor@emc.com>
> >
> > * gdb.texinfo: Document new -at LOCATION option of the 'info
> > macro' command.
>
> Please state the node in which the change was made (as if it were a
> function, i.e. in parentheses).
Okay, how about:
2014-11-10 David Taylor <dtaylor@emc.com>
* gdb.texinfo (Macros): Document new -at LOCATION option of
the 'info macro' command.
> > -@item info macro [-a|-all] [--] @var{macro}
> > +@item info macro [-a|-all] [-at LOCATION,] [--] @var{macro}
> > Show the current definition or all definitions of the named @var{macro},
> > and describe the source location or compiler command-line where that
> > definition was established. The optional double dash is to signify the end of
> > argument processing and the beginning of @var{macro} for non C-like macros where
> > -the macro may begin with a hyphen.
> > +the macro may begin with a hyphen. If the optional LOCATION is specified,
> > +it is used instead of the current location.
>
> First, "LOCATION" should be "@var{location}", as it is a parameter,
> not a literal string.
Easy enough. Done.
> And second, "it is used instead of the current location" leaves too
> much unsaid. The reader will wonder why does location matter for this
> purpose. I suggest to make that explicit in the text.
I'm not sure how to word it nor exactly what you are looking for.
How about the following for the gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo piece:
Index: gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvsroot/GDB/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.3 gdb.texinfo
--- gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo 21 Aug 2014 14:07:17 -0000 1.3
+++ gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo 11 Nov 2014 13:53:09 -0000
@@ -11412,12 +11412,15 @@
@cindex macro definition, showing
@cindex definition of a macro, showing
@cindex macros, from debug info
-@item info macro [-a|-all] [--] @var{macro}
+@item info macro [-a|-all] [-at LOCATION,] [--] @var{macro}
Show the current definition or all definitions of the named @var{macro},
and describe the source location or compiler command-line where that
-definition was established. The optional double dash is to signify the end of
-argument processing and the beginning of @var{macro} for non C-like macros where
-the macro may begin with a hyphen.
+definition was established. The optional double dash is to signify the
+end of argument processing and the beginning of @var{macro} for non
+C-like macros where the macro may begin with a hyphen. If the optional
+@var{location} is specified, it is used to determine which definition,
+if any, of the macro is in scope; otherwise, as before, it uses the
+source and line asociated with the current program counter.
@kindex info macros
@item info macros @var{linespec}
Thanks for reviewing the doc changes so quickly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-11 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-10 21:41 David Taylor
2014-11-11 3:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-11-11 14:01 ` David Taylor [this message]
2014-11-11 15:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-11-19 21:00 ` RFA info macro [-at LOCATION,] (v2) David Taylor
2014-11-19 21:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-11-20 2:38 ` Doug Evans
[not found] ` <001a1132e59ca4575e0508413955@google.com>
[not found] ` <CAP9bCMRJr4Fbunbnt-93FYnWUgDqjaLWZ731_rZp-JP8qkKf=w@mail.gmail.com>
2014-11-20 14:58 ` Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) David Taylor
2014-11-23 19:18 ` Doug Evans
2014-11-23 20:00 ` Doug Evans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7612.1415714475@usendtaylorx2l \
--to=dtaylor@usendtaylorx2l.lss.emc.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).