public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Taylor <dtaylor@usendtaylorx2l.lss.emc.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: RFA: info macro [-at LOCATION,]
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:01:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7612.1415714475@usendtaylorx2l> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83mw7ymmdw.fsf@gnu.org>

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: David Taylor <dtaylor@emc.com>
> > Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:41:33 -0500
> > 
> > A few releases ago it was possible to set a location that would be used
> > by 'info location' by typing something like:
> > 
> >     list file.c:42
> > 
> > and then do:
> > 
> >     info macro MACRONAME
> > 
> > .  Sometime between release 7.1 and 7.8 that stopped working.
> > 
> > The following patch adds the option [-at LOCATION,] to 'info macro' to
> > enable the use of a user selected location as a documented feature.
> > 
> > Three files, three change log entries:
> 
> Thanks.  I think this warrants a NEWS entry as well.

Thanks.  How are diffs for NEWS handled?  For the text, how about:

* New options

The info macro command now takes an optional location ([-at LOCATION,])
for determining which definition, if any, of the macro is in scope.  If
left unspecified it, as before, uses the source and line associated with
the current program counter.

> > gdb/doc/ChangeLog:
> > 
> > 2014-11-10  David Taylor  <dtaylor@emc.com>
> > 
> > 	* gdb.texinfo: Document new -at LOCATION option of the 'info
> > 	macro' command.
> 
> Please state the node in which the change was made (as if it were a
> function, i.e. in parentheses).

Okay, how about:

2014-11-10  David Taylor  <dtaylor@emc.com>

	* gdb.texinfo (Macros): Document new -at LOCATION option of
	the 'info macro' command.

> > -@item info macro [-a|-all] [--] @var{macro}
> > +@item info macro [-a|-all] [-at LOCATION,] [--] @var{macro}
> >  Show the current definition or all definitions of the named @var{macro},
> >  and describe the source location or compiler command-line where that
> >  definition was established.  The optional double dash is to signify the end of
> >  argument processing and the beginning of @var{macro} for non C-like macros where
> > -the macro may begin with a hyphen.
> > +the macro may begin with a hyphen.  If the optional LOCATION is specified,
> > +it is used instead of the current location.
> 
> First, "LOCATION" should be "@var{location}", as it is a parameter,
> not a literal string.

Easy enough.  Done.

> And second, "it is used instead of the current location" leaves too
> much unsaid.  The reader will wonder why does location matter for this
> purpose.  I suggest to make that explicit in the text.

I'm not sure how to word it nor exactly what you are looking for.
How about the following for the gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo piece:

Index: gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvsroot/GDB/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.3 gdb.texinfo
--- gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo	21 Aug 2014 14:07:17 -0000	1.3
+++ gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo	11 Nov 2014 13:53:09 -0000
@@ -11412,12 +11412,15 @@
 @cindex macro definition, showing
 @cindex definition of a macro, showing
 @cindex macros, from debug info
-@item info macro [-a|-all] [--] @var{macro}
+@item info macro [-a|-all] [-at LOCATION,] [--] @var{macro}
 Show the current definition or all definitions of the named @var{macro},
 and describe the source location or compiler command-line where that
-definition was established.  The optional double dash is to signify the end of
-argument processing and the beginning of @var{macro} for non C-like macros where
-the macro may begin with a hyphen.
+definition was established.  The optional double dash is to signify the
+end of argument processing and the beginning of @var{macro} for non
+C-like macros where the macro may begin with a hyphen.  If the optional
+@var{location} is specified, it is used to determine which definition,
+if any, of the macro is in scope; otherwise, as before, it uses the
+source and line asociated with the current program counter.
 
 @kindex info macros
 @item info macros @var{linespec}

Thanks for reviewing the doc changes so quickly.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-11 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-10 21:41 David Taylor
2014-11-11  3:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-11-11 14:01   ` David Taylor [this message]
2014-11-11 15:41     ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-11-19 21:00   ` RFA info macro [-at LOCATION,] (v2) David Taylor
2014-11-19 21:20     ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-11-20  2:38     ` Doug Evans
     [not found]       ` <001a1132e59ca4575e0508413955@google.com>
     [not found]         ` <CAP9bCMRJr4Fbunbnt-93FYnWUgDqjaLWZ731_rZp-JP8qkKf=w@mail.gmail.com>
2014-11-20 14:58           ` Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) David Taylor
2014-11-23 19:18             ` Doug Evans
2014-11-23 20:00               ` Doug Evans

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7612.1415714475@usendtaylorx2l \
    --to=dtaylor@usendtaylorx2l.lss.emc.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).