From: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] Python QUIT processing updates
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 19:24:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <764a5dcc-4391-ead3-61c1-82359ff80bf7@palves.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210822231959.184061-5-kevinb@redhat.com>
On 2021-08-23 12:20 a.m., Kevin Buettner via Gdb-patches wrote:
> See the previous patch in this series for the motivation behind these
> updates.
>
> This commit contains updates to Python's QUIT handling. Specifically,
> it makes sure that a SIGTERM sent to GDB will be propagated to the top
> level. While there are instances where we want to allow python code
> to catch Ctrl-C / SIGINT (and possibly) swallow it, I don't think we
> want that behavior for SIGTERM. Therefore, there are cases where
> sync_quit_force_run is checked explicitly. In other cases, I
> was able to defer the decision to GDB_PY_HANDLE_EXCEPTION. (My goal
> was to minimize explicit references to sync_quit_force_run.)
Something to ponder about is whether having a distinct gdb_exception_sigterm
would be cleaner.
> ---
> gdb/python/py-finishbreakpoint.c | 6 ++++--
> gdb/python/py-gdb-readline.c | 12 ++++++++----
> gdb/python/py-symbol.c | 4 ++++
> gdb/python/py-utils.c | 4 +++-
> gdb/python/py-value.c | 4 ++++
> 5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/python/py-finishbreakpoint.c b/gdb/python/py-finishbreakpoint.c
> index 1d8373d807e..120e40db6eb 100644
> --- a/gdb/python/py-finishbreakpoint.c
> +++ b/gdb/python/py-finishbreakpoint.c
> @@ -270,8 +270,10 @@ bpfinishpy_init (PyObject *self, PyObject *args, PyObject *kwargs)
> }
> catch (const gdb_exception &except)
> {
> - /* Just swallow. Either the return type or the function value
> - remain NULL. */
> + /* Swallow everything except for a SIGTERM sent to GDB. Either the
> + return type or the function value remain NULL. */
> + if (sync_quit_force_run)
> + throw;
AFAIK, it is not safe to let C++ exceptions cross the Python runtime, as Python
is written in C. The issue may be papered over on x86-64 Linux and there
everything is built with -fasynchronous-unwind-tables. Even if it looks like
it works, Python doesn't see the exception at all so isn't given a chance to
properly cleanup as the exception unwinds the stack.
The same concern applies to the rest of the patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-27 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-22 23:19 [PATCH v2 0/6] glibc-2.34: Fix gdb.base/gdb-sigterm.exp failure/error Kevin Buettner
2021-08-22 23:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] Handle recursive internal problem in gdb_internal_error_resync Kevin Buettner
2021-09-27 17:38 ` Pedro Alves
2022-02-26 20:40 ` Kevin Buettner
2021-08-22 23:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] Handle gdb SIGTERM via normal QUIT processing Kevin Buettner
2021-09-27 17:39 ` Pedro Alves
2021-08-22 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] Catch and (re)throw gdb_exception_quit Kevin Buettner
2021-09-27 18:05 ` Pedro Alves
2021-08-22 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] Python QUIT processing updates Kevin Buettner
2021-09-27 18:24 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2021-08-22 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] Guile " Kevin Buettner
2021-09-27 18:26 ` Pedro Alves
2021-08-22 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] QUIT processing w/ explicit sync_quit_force_run check Kevin Buettner
2021-09-27 18:34 ` Pedro Alves
2021-09-27 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] glibc-2.34: Fix gdb.base/gdb-sigterm.exp failure/error Kevin Buettner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=764a5dcc-4391-ead3-61c1-82359ff80bf7@palves.net \
--to=pedro@palves.net \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).