From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 147FC384242A for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 15:34:26 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 147FC384242A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [172.16.0.95] (192-222-181-218.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.181.218]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81BAE1E58E; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 11:34:25 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnulib: Ensure all libraries are used when building gdb/gdbserver To: Andrew Burgess Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20201005165134.1620549-1-andrew.burgess@embecosm.com> <2feb66c2-8f65-7cbf-d1be-ae3d04b45d9a@simark.ca> <20201006121751.GK605036@embecosm.com> <95d52add-47c2-9621-7e60-1ff9a4331324@simark.ca> <20201007153319.GL605036@embecosm.com> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <7d01a037-9469-b5e4-c0fb-fcfe3a0e98f1@simark.ca> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 11:34:25 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201007153319.GL605036@embecosm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: tl Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 15:34:27 -0000 On 2020-10-07 11:33 a.m., Andrew Burgess wrote: > The patch below has these two fixes. I'll apply in a couple of days > unless anyone objects. Thanks, then I don't think I need to take another look, I suppose it looks good to me :). Simon