From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-f45.google.com (mail-wm1-f45.google.com [209.85.128.45]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 908453858C2D for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 15:22:36 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 908453858C2D Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=palves.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-wm1-f45.google.com with SMTP id n13so1247484wmr.4 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 07:22:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version :user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fWSVHLpvo+F2CTpkeBjkiAy8hpRxCfBRC8yz0nKQI1Y=; b=Q4csQF+CeT89fgLJqvcJzhFyoUofrrevUmenZbjngDWcuAfqt54a6Jaf4RTf+kZ97B aqUMwv+VQFzsy8Idqt7lV3gNEW0bt5X2mJMh7Ti8AS9iuNs+M1zgoDa3EiN0BvqwQ6Cq 3bpirhTzKjti+WcfYUkjBG2Etftaeo0kjS1yEyoXFghjKgtnn88RF7m7B+pRpy7fFOt3 sGTnm90X6L6jNH9uL6QtcuHEfC0G3ajZAXzDyXUoD1qPBwaYRSeCVQfuQF9jwMlYphiJ srexGcFUCXrhCM5ydlaeJuWoIL7+/v6/T6cNd37WQQCmOhWKu/bwOiddaOSwIG49og0Q lNqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2komWZOPUaUho6LQ6Qy279Lkki7eHKzV3Qt9ecBDoGVAXPQKnRD1 Hjls1dYOukC+tzbNBtAc1tmjzjk5N+FXIQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtiy0qcYPmaHr+9gxUiZyQs3ty1oGMGeqxec8puy3pIATAeUJScEORtxrL9abV599J/oafU2w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:6014:b0:3db:127e:403 with SMTP id az20-20020a05600c601400b003db127e0403mr44305314wmb.37.1675092155175; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 07:22:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8a0:f92b:9e00::1fe? ([2001:8a0:f92b:9e00::1fe]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y21-20020a05600c17d500b003dc46242c4csm7923825wmo.10.2023.01.30.07.22.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Jan 2023 07:22:34 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [pushed] Invert test in gdb.ada/ptype_tagged_param.exp To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20230127172427.4132635-1-tromey@adacore.com> <89869c3c-0a4f-67e3-dd98-13ea090b31c6@palves.net> <87r0vfpu95.fsf@tromey.com> <87v8konjyj.fsf@tromey.com> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <7d13d9bb-2921-5e11-4785-915099dc0cfe@palves.net> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 15:22:33 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87v8konjyj.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 2023-01-30 3:03 p.m., Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>> kfail "no debug info" $gdb_test_name >>> > Pedro> Why is this a kfail instead of an xfail? Is there really a GDB bug here? >>> >>> It's just my perennial inability to distinguish the two. There's no gdb >>> bug, this seems to be a compiler issue. If changing it to xfail is >>> correct, let me know and I will do it. > > Pedro> :-) > > Pedro> Yes, kfail is correct. > > Confusing! But I think just a typo. Sorry! Yes, unfortunate typo. > I'm going to send a patch to change it. Thank you.