From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDCA1385DC1C for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 05:59:57 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org CDCA1385DC1C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=eliz@gnu.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49269) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSDr3-0006N8-A6; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 01:59:57 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1552 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jSDr1-000364-FW; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 01:59:56 -0400 Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 08:59:45 +0300 Message-Id: <831roc9kby.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20200424203911.26599-1-tromey@adacore.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Fri, 24 Apr 2020 14:39:11 -0600) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Expand dynamic type documentation References: <20200424203911.26599-1-tromey@adacore.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 05:59:58 -0000 > From: Tom Tromey > Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 14:39:11 -0600 > Cc: Tom Tromey > > This expands the Python dynamic type documentation, as suggested by > Christian. > > gdb/doc/ChangeLog > 2020-04-24 Tom Tromey > > * python.texi (Types In Python): Mention missing fields. Add > dynamic type example. Fine with me, with one minor comment: > +Here, at least conceptually (whether your compiler actually does this > +is a separate issue), examining @code{gdb.lookup_symbol("array", ...).type} This long @code{..} expression is likely to be split between lines; to prevent that, I suggest to wrap it in @w{..}. Thanks.