From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 83250 invoked by alias); 29 May 2016 18:19:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 83239 invoked by uid 89); 29 May 2016 18:19:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HX-HELO:eggs.gnu.org, Hx-spam-relays-external:208.118.235.92, H*RU:208.118.235.92, news X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 29 May 2016 18:18:57 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b75Ib-0003Nm-VG for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sun, 29 May 2016 14:18:54 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:56658) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b75IE-0003J6-It; Sun, 29 May 2016 14:18:30 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3400 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1b75IA-0005IP-6s; Sun, 29 May 2016 14:18:28 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 18:19:00 -0000 Message-Id: <831t4kybh6.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Jan Kratochvil CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be, sergiodj@redhat.com, palves@redhat.com, xdje42@gmail.com, scox@redhat.com, jistone@redhat.com In-reply-to: <20160529175032.GA25095@host1.jankratochvil.net> (message from Jan Kratochvil on Sun, 29 May 2016 19:50:32 +0200) Subject: Re: [doc] NEWS: QCatchSyscalls: simplify Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <1449196006-13759-2-git-send-email-jistone@redhat.com> <1452308954-13679-1-git-send-email-jistone@redhat.com> <20160529164745.GA21714@host1.jankratochvil.net> <8337p0ydqo.fsf@gnu.org> <20160529175032.GA25095@host1.jankratochvil.net> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg00532.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 19:50:32 +0200 > From: Jan Kratochvil > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be, > sergiodj@redhat.com, palves@redhat.com, xdje42@gmail.com, > scox@redhat.com, jistone@redhat.com > > On Sun, 29 May 2016 19:29:19 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Is it really that bad? I generally tend to let people say things in > > their own words, as long as it's readable. But if you insist... > > That :1 and :0 was confusing to me as it is very different from all the other > remote packets announced in the NEWS file, therefore I was looking at the > protocol how is this packet special. How can be ':' a part of the packet name > when ':' is a parameter delimiter? And I haven't found anything special on > this packet. > > Similarly the qSupported looked special to me and again it does not seem to be > anyhow special. Even "N stop reply" announced right above uses the standard > template. > > Besides that all IMO one of the purposes of the NEWS file is to be brief. > > Sure I do not mind but I was reviewing a derived downstream documentation and > I just found it. If you feel strongly about this, please go ahead and commit. Thanks.