From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9003383A37F for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 18:45:19 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org C9003383A37F Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56618) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oEbAl-0003Xm-9S; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 14:45:19 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1993 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oEbAk-0000hH-03; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 14:45:19 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 21:45:12 +0300 Message-Id: <8335eumhjb.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <2254fb64-63ee-99e4-15d7-24cd411836db@palves.net> (message from Pedro Alves on Thu, 21 Jul 2022 19:30:23 +0100) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] struct packed: Use gcc_struct on Windows References: <20220721152132.3489524-1-pedro@palves.net> <20220721152132.3489524-2-pedro@palves.net> <83h73amp19.fsf@gnu.org> <83a692mkj7.fsf@gnu.org> <7b3aa811-a2a8-3b3f-7a6f-40196e4e6901@palves.net> <835yjqmiip.fsf@gnu.org> <2254fb64-63ee-99e4-15d7-24cd411836db@palves.net> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 18:45:20 -0000 > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Pedro Alves > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 19:30:23 +0100 > > > If this is supposed to be based on our vigilance and manual prevention > > of exporting it, I think it's fragile and not very reliable. If we > > forget or miss something, we get a subtly broken build. > > I'm sorry, but this isn't making a lot of sense. You know, Pedro, it has become very hard to talk to you about almost anything here. You become annoyed almost from the second sentence I write, and your annoyance shows. It doesn't matter if the subject is some patch to documentation or something in the code, it is impossible for me to conduct any serious discussion without triggering your annoyance, with the resulting very unpleasant exchange. I'm outta here.