From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29674 invoked by alias); 24 Dec 2019 15:52:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29664 invoked by uid 89); 24 Dec 2019 15:52:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=burgess, Burgess, U*andrew.burgess, andrew.burgess@embecosm.com X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (209.51.188.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 15:52:51 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45561) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ijmUM-0002va-2R; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 10:52:50 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1615 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ijmUL-0005Zu-FY; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 10:52:49 -0500 Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 15:52:00 -0000 Message-Id: <834kxpwwje.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrew Burgess CC: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20191224122354.GH3865@embecosm.com> (message from Andrew Burgess on Tue, 24 Dec 2019 12:23:54 +0000) Subject: Re: GDB 9.1 release 2019-12-23 update References: <20191223093031.GE11677@adacore.com> <835zi7xh7o.fsf@gnu.org> <20191224034652.GA25918@adacore.com> <20191224122354.GH3865@embecosm.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-12/txt/msg00998.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 12:23:54 +0000 > From: Andrew Burgess > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > > What about the compilation warning in record-btrace.c I reported in > > > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-12/msg00706.html? Do we > > > want to fix it? > > > > We can, but (IMO) not super critical. FWIW, I don't get the warning > > when buidling on GNU/Linux. > > I can reproduce the warning on GNU/Linux, but it only crops up at some > optimisation levels, -O0 doesn't warn for me, while -O1 and -O2 do. > I've tested with GCC 8.3, 9.2, and a 10.??. This is all on a Fedora > 27 system (yes, I really should update). FTR, my GCC version is 8.3, and I did use -O2 optimizations. Thanks.