From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABABE3858D28 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 15:46:25 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org ABABE3858D28 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37326) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o7Iqf-0004kR-8U; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 11:46:25 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3446 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o7Iqc-0002IO-86; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 11:46:25 -0400 Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 18:46:34 +0300 Message-Id: <837d4wesyt.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: (macro@embecosm.com) Subject: Re: [PATCH] GDB/doc: Remove extraneous spaces from completion examples References: X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 15:46:26 -0000 > Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:13:05 +0100 (BST) > From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" > (gdb) info bre > (gdb) info breakpoints > > does the right thing, but is not what is shown in the manual. > > In other cases an extraneous space is used that does not correspond to > the actual completion pattern shown, which gives an impression of > sloppiness. > > Remove extraneous spaces then from completion examples as appropriate. > --- > Hi, > > Noticed while making documentation updates for "NUMBER" completion. > > OK to apply? Yes, thanks.