From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC5D93857C4A for ; Tue, 31 May 2022 16:06:35 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org EC5D93857C4A Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40994) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nw4OB-00027r-8k; Tue, 31 May 2022 12:06:35 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3810 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nw4OA-0005xu-23; Tue, 31 May 2022 12:06:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 19:06:39 +0300 Message-Id: <837d61it4g.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <8d188138-0820-7276-9e9f-c80be6f82237@palves.net> (message from Pedro Alves on Tue, 31 May 2022 15:47:20 +0100) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve clear command's documentation References: <20220526194250.2310460-1-pedro@palves.net> <838rqmm7gb.fsf@gnu.org> <6914f754-4e33-5aa1-4ea6-dca9504e8bfe@palves.net> <837d63j8tx.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0a1j2ur.fsf@gnu.org> <3c77c9b4-9984-0a71-c6fc-04fc707b6b07@palves.net> <83fskpizsu.fsf@gnu.org> <8d188138-0820-7276-9e9f-c80be6f82237@palves.net> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 16:06:37 -0000 > Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 15:47:20 +0100 > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Pedro Alves > > Done. Just with one small tweak -- your text used wording that assumes a breakpoint > only has one location, "deletes any breakpoint whose code location is at", etc. > I tweaked it to say "any breakpoint with a code location that is at", etc. Right. I copied your original text too faithfully ;-)