From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 34349 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2017 03:40:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 32748 invoked by uid 89); 21 Dec 2017 03:40:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 03:40:33 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRrih-0007On-CI for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 22:40:32 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45808) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRric-0007Hb-AW; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 22:40:26 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3946 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eRrib-0002JL-P5; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 22:40:26 -0500 Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 03:40:00 -0000 Message-Id: <837etgoiiu.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Simon Marchi CC: shorne@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org In-reply-to: <596161e11663add8b95ca70dd1f8f12b@polymtl.ca> (message from Simon Marchi on Wed, 20 Dec 2017 21:40:10 -0500) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] reggroups: Add test and docs for `info reg $reggroup` feature Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20171219142257.13402-1-shorne@gmail.com> <20171219142257.13402-2-shorne@gmail.com> <837etiptz2.fsf@gnu.org> <596161e11663add8b95ca70dd1f8f12b@polymtl.ca> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-12/txt/msg00465.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 21:40:10 -0500 > From: Simon Marchi > Cc: Stafford Horne , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, > openrisc@lists.librecores.org > > >> +@code{maint print reggroups}. > > > > Please add here a cross-reference to the node where "maint print > > reggroups" is described. > > Is it ok for a non-maint command to refer to a maint command? Yes. > AFAIK, we don't expect an average user to have to use maintenance > commands when using GDB. So maybe "maint print reggroups" should be > promoted to a non-maint command (e.g. info register-groups)? Registers are not for the average user anyway, so I don't see a problem here.