From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eliz@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECBB63858D20
 for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue,  1 Mar 2022 15:18:06 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org ECBB63858D20
Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=37792 helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1nP4GM-0005G1-01; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 10:18:06 -0500
Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1070 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1nP4GL-0002GE-BG; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 10:18:05 -0500
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 17:17:57 +0200
Message-Id: <838rttln16.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-Reply-To: <87czj5locm.fsf@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Tue, 01
 Mar 2022 07:49:29 -0700)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Handle non-ASCII identifiers in Ada
References: <20220228183304.1162089-1-tromey@adacore.com>
 <20220228183304.1162089-6-tromey@adacore.com> <83y21ulsuo.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87lexulnba.fsf@tromey.com> <83wnhel5bn.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87czj5locm.fsf@tromey.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF,
 RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/gdb-patches>,
 <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/gdb-patches>,
 <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 15:18:12 -0000

> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
> Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>,  gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 07:49:29 -0700
> 
> These were in Unicode back in 2001.
> 
> Eli> Or maybe we should document what is the
> Eli> oldest version of Python that currently suits the needs?
> 
> Most people shouldn't run this script.  The output is checked in.  And
> if they do and get wildly different results, that will be caught in
> review.
> 
> Of course, it won't really matter, because you can't really write an Ada
> program -- at least, not using GNAT -- that uses anything after 2001
> anyway.  This covers all the Python versions that are in normal use.
> 
> For example Python 2.7, the oldest one I have around (and for which gdb
> is going to drop support soon anyway):
> 
> >>> import unicodedata
> >>> unicodedata.unidata_version
> '5.2.0'
> 
> This version of the data comes from 2009, plenty new enough.

Ok, I guess there's no real problem, then.

Thanks.