From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30263 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2015 18:45:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 30247 invoked by uid 89); 3 Feb 2015 18:45:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout24.012.net.il Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il (HELO mtaout24.012.net.il) (80.179.55.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 18:45:41 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NJ700900KQIT400@mtaout24.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 20:37:25 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NJ7005THL2DMA50@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 20:37:25 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 18:45:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: GDB 7.9 release update In-reply-to: <54D0DA28.9080500@redhat.com> To: Pedro Alves Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pmuldoon@redhat.com, arnez@vnet.linux.ibm.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <838ugehm0o.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20150127043704.GB4697@adacore.com> <20150129045344.GC5193@adacore.com> <54D0DA28.9080500@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00058.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 15:24:40 +0100 > From: Pedro Alves > CC: gdb-patches , Phil Muldoon , arnez@vnet.linux.ibm.com > > On 01/29/2015 05:53 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > > I am also wondering if we should also wait for... > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17837 ... or not. > > Pedro, I see you've been kind enough to start looking into this > > (bugzilla papertrail). What do you think? Blocker, not blocker? > > I'm not sure. I haven't fully understood what the scripts in > question are doing and how the issue triggers. I've asked Jan > if he could come up with a simplified reproducer. Hopefully we'll > have a better idea soon. > > > There was also this: > > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-01/msg00703.html > > The issue there is that with both remote and record targets, GDB > can get messed up after 'query'. That's a regression compared > to 7.8. > > I think I'll go push that series to master ASAP. I'll wait for > feedback on the plan before pushing into 7.9 though. Can we please solve the TUI slow display on MS-Windows? Two patches were proposed, can we please commit one of them? TIA