From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18755 invoked by alias); 2 May 2014 07:22:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 18738 invoked by uid 89); 2 May 2014 07:22:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout21.012.net.il Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 May 2014 07:22:43 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N4X00E00QRZ4A00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 02 May 2014 10:22:40 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N4X00DP1R5SZA70@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 02 May 2014 10:22:40 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 07:22:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH, doc RFA] Make compare-sections work against all targets; add, compare-sections [-r] tests In-reply-to: <5362EBEE.5030902@redhat.com> To: Pedro Alves Cc: keiths@redhat.com, dtaylor@emc.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <838uqklk4v.fsf@gnu.org> References: <24262.1395849610@usendtaylorx2l> <29572.1396557529@usendtaylorx2l> <18733.1397666636@usendtaylorx2l> <534F0493.9040404@redhat.com> <5362EBEE.5030902@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 01:50:54 +0100 > From: Pedro Alves > CC: David Taylor , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" > > On 04/16/2014 11:30 PM, Keith Seitz wrote: > > > 2.5) I'm a testing freak, so I'd really like to see is a test case. > > Alas, I see that there are no tests /at all/ for compare-sections, so > > that may be heaping more hardship onto this than is either necessary or > > plausible. I am not going to ask you to provide one because of this, but > > a global maintainer might. > > Yeah, I ended up not requesting one, as it could reasonable be argued > that it'd not be that fair, but I wrote one now. > While at it, I made "compare-sections" work against all targets... > Let me know what you think. > > Eli, docs OK? Yes, thanks.