From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-74504-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28702 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2010 17:07:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 28366 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jul 2010 17:07:29 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:07:20 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L6600300CTHF100@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:05:52 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.61.30]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L6600MGCCTSPZD0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:05:52 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:07:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Allow gdb.Values to become callable if appropriate.
In-reply-to: <4C4D5296.3040108@redhat.com>
To: Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <838w4yb2bx.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <4C442BAA.2020300@redhat.com> <m31vaxajct.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4C4D5296.3040108@redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00395.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:17:10 +0100
> From: Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
> 
> +A @code{gdb.Value} that represents a function can be executed via
> +inferior function call.  Any arguments provided to the call must match
> +the function prototype of the function, and must be provided in the
> +same order expected in that prototype.

Suggest a slight rewording:

    A @code{gdb.Value} that represents a function can be executed via
    inferior function call.  Any arguments provided to the call must match
    the function's prototype, and must be provided in the order specified
    by that prototype.

Okay with those changes.

Thanks.