From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31C233858D33 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 19:41:21 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 31C233858D33 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pcAWO-0007Ct-Df; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 15:41:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=If+eUmEONeYsxenjGDoHATv4tazG4dhFFmRsZfnKFqc=; b=bL+C7vkUPW69Ukex7fp8 cTp10ranqH+Wm7VsqGc7kYAE3osMfmYfsBjo37DmR72DKRgXQakEIcR6LqENN0QcXts7lxu3ANStf gRjEQSireXkOrkVuJMs4WHPUkwR7HyJ9891cFGMCv/mivLiHZRUaLXoGOLI5t+JnRA4OzBgiVYc1L FDRul7HciGA1KF5RJOWA+QFXOn+UjqojyH1QOq+KNRbimqJ8KGZqXEZHnR9PrcdS2i3lH57h2x21e E4BAEtkFn/5IDVjsvcfi7+ycd39V9oKdY78/2h52s04hq03HFD9R2EnH5vW5kWDP8O8+fyhAj0Hmp L2/JNNrAv6FvDQ==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pcAWN-0005IV-QW; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 15:41:20 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 21:41:14 +0200 Message-Id: <83a60fruhx.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Philippe Blain Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, apinski@marvell.com In-Reply-To: (message from Philippe Blain on Tue, 14 Mar 2023 13:38:08 -0400) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gdb/doc: uniformize wording for GMP and MPFR entries References: <20230306-doc-require-mpfr-fix-v1-0-8f207504dd3e@gmail.com> <20230306-doc-require-mpfr-fix-v1-2-8f207504dd3e@gmail.com> <83ttysxvp9.fsf@gnu.org> <83y1nzsfgu.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > From: Philippe Blain > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, apinski@marvell.com > Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 13:38:08 -0400 > > Le 2023-03-14 à 13:12, Philippe Blain a écrit : > > Hi Eli, > > > [...] > > > > I guess I was confused by the fact that 'Approved-by' is used here in a different way > > than in the Git project, where it is an explicit approval > > I meant 'Reviewed-by' here, sorry. Do they really use Reviewed-by as an approval? _That_ would be confusing, since the word "review" means just that, it doesn't mean any approval.