public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Torbjorn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Generated GDB documentation have colliding files on a case insensitive files system
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 14:24:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83a62rq4jg.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64679b6c-e318-0b7a-2dad-9a1f716f9ba8@foss.st.com> (message from Torbjorn SVENSSON on Mon, 9 Jan 2023 07:51:17 +0100)

> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 07:51:17 +0100
> CC: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> From: Torbjorn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com>
> 
> >> I was considering if the redirect files could simply be removed from the
> >> GDB documentation tree or if they are actually used for inter components
> >> references.
> > 
> > They are produced by makeinfo, and they are produced for a reason, no?
> 
> According to the other thread, they are generated to easy cross linking 
> the documentation. There is nothing in the documentation that will 
> generate a link to any of these files, so hence the question if they are 
> needed by GDB.

Maybe I'm confused, but don't you above answer your own question?
"Easy cross linking" is the reason.

> >> Even if we get a solution merged in texinfo, it will take years for it
> >> to get activity used, and in the mean while, we are stuck with this
> >> issue in GDB.
> > 
> > I still don't want to make any conclusions until the Texinfo
> > discussion is completed.  How do you know there's no solution with the
> > existing Texinfo versions?
> 
> As I understood it, it was proved that the redirect pages were colliding 
> and no way around that in current implementation, but maybe I 
> misunderstood the reply...

AFAIU, it's a bug in Texinfo.  I hope they will solve it at some
point.

But now let me turn the table and ask you why we as a project should
care about HTML version of the manual being installed on MS-Windows?

Having said that, I have no serious objections to changing the name of
the anchor if it will solve the problem for you.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-09 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-07  9:21 Torbjorn SVENSSON
2023-01-07  9:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-01-07  9:42   ` Torbjorn SVENSSON
2023-01-07 10:43     ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-01-07 10:52       ` Torbjorn SVENSSON
2023-01-07 11:08         ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-01-09  6:51           ` Torbjorn SVENSSON
2023-01-09 12:24             ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2023-01-15 17:22               ` Torbjorn SVENSSON
2023-01-15 17:39                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-01-15 17:43                   ` Torbjorn SVENSSON
2023-01-15 18:09                     ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83a62rq4jg.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).