From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B71223899019 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 14:00:44 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B71223899019 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=58254 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nZvLv-0000bx-K1; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 10:00:43 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2421 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nZvLi-00040T-QD; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 10:00:42 -0400 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:00:41 +0300 Message-Id: <83a6d66x2u.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Pedro Alves Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: (message from Pedro Alves on Thu, 31 Mar 2022 13:05:17 +0100) Subject: Re: GDB 12.0.90 available for testing References: <20220320055815.2A90FA4D6C@takamaka.home> <83sfr4a93r.fsf@gnu.org> <83o81m7icz.fsf@gnu.org> <4f1b387d-8b63-47d6-79aa-93b27a2cdb9d@palves.net> <83czi272pt.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 14:00:46 -0000 > Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 13:05:17 +0100 > Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Pedro Alves > > > Does this test fail on GNU/Linux? If not, can you (or someone else) > > tell what is the difference between GNU/Linux and Windows for this > > purpose? Neither is using Latin-1 as the default host charset, right? > > I see the same warning on GNU/Linux, just different host encoding: > > (gdb) maint selftest > ... > Running selftest dw2_expand_symtabs_matching. > warning: could not convert 'yfunc�' from the host encoding (UTF-8) to UTF-32. > This normally should not happen, please file a bug report. > warning: charset conversion failure for 'yfunc�'. > You may have the wrong value for 'set ada source-charset'. > ... > Ran 145 unit tests, 0 failed > (gdb) > > Note the "0 failed" at the end. I assume you get that too? That's what I mean > by "this is not really a failure, it's just a warning". Yes, I also get a zero. Thanks, if this produces warnings on GNU/Linux as well, I guess it can be considered "normal".