From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 126390 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2016 15:52:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 126368 invoked by uid 89); 11 Mar 2016 15:52:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:sk:cable.0, H*r:sk:RSA_AES, HX-Received-From:4830, HX-Received-From:134 X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:52:10 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aePMG-0006mB-7i for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:52:08 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47860) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aePMA-0006ga-D4; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:52:02 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3844 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aePM9-0004g9-Iv; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:52:02 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:52:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83a8m5j9mc.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Pedro Alves CC: sekiriki@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, fercerpav@gmail.com, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com In-reply-to: <56E1A467.5060509@redhat.com> (message from Pedro Alves on Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:44:23 +0000) Subject: Re: [PATCH] supports IPv6 only remote target Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <831t8ldc80.fsf@gnu.org> <83oaboa0x5.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9hg9xrj.fsf@gnu.org> <56E1A467.5060509@redhat.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-03/txt/msg00190.txt.bz2 > From: Pedro Alves > Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:44:23 +0000 > > On 02/10/2016 07:21 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Do we care about W2K support at this point? AFAIK, quite a few > > MinGW64 headers require and set _WIN32_WINNT to a value that will > > exclude W2K anyway. > > > > I suggest to wait for Pedro or Joel to chime in on this issue. > > I wouldn't care about W2K at this point. Fair enough, but then we should set _WIN32_WINNT to a suitable value, or else compilation using mingw.org's w32api headers will not see the prototype of getaddrinfo, and maybe also some related stuff.