public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: palves@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Speed up "gdb -tui" output
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:32:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83a91u75fe.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADPb22T=uuHjDrsxrOyjh2XS0=wf_HxkxNGYHC_hAsvr7saJjw@mail.gmail.com>

> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 11:15:59 -0800
> From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
> Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> 
> >> Sure, but it does suggest tui_puts is the wrong place to do
> >> any kind of flushing/refreshing.
> >
> > How else can you emulate the unbuffered nature of gdb_stderr and the
> > line-buffered nature of gdb_stdout, for example?  The GDB application
> > code implicitly expects that.
> 
> If one wants to restrict the problem to just gdb_stderr vs gdb_stdout
> (which is insufficient, since gdb_stdout gets unfiltered output),
> but for discussion's sake ...
> The tui to_puts method, tui_file_fputs, knows what the stream is.

So?  How does this help?  The stderr problem is simple, but what do
you do with stdout and stdlog?  Especially when tui_file_fputs is
called one character at a time in most cases.

We are going in circles.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-07 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-06 16:12 Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-06 18:37 ` Doug Evans
2015-01-06 19:06   ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-06 20:54     ` Doug Evans
2015-01-07 18:30       ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-07 19:08         ` Doug Evans
2015-01-07 19:20           ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-07 19:30             ` Doug Evans
2015-01-07 19:48               ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-07 20:45                 ` Doug Evans
2015-01-07 21:59                   ` Doug Evans
2015-01-19 17:55                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-19 18:32                       ` Doug Evans
2015-01-31 21:37                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-02-03 17:52                           ` Pedro Alves
2015-02-03 18:47                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-02-04 11:55                             ` Pedro Alves
2015-02-04 12:27                               ` Pedro Alves
2015-02-04 15:39                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-02-04 15:38                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-07 15:18   ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-07 17:57     ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-07 18:09       ` Doug Evans
2015-01-07 18:34         ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-07 19:16           ` Doug Evans
2015-01-07 19:32             ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2015-01-07 22:30               ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-19 17:52                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-07 18:00     ` Doug Evans
2015-01-07 18:12       ` Doug Evans
2015-01-07 18:34         ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-07 18:21       ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-07 18:56         ` Doug Evans
2015-01-07 19:11           ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83a91u75fe.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=dje@google.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).