From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CA73385782D for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 15:35:50 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 9CA73385782D Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56702) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kX4XG-00017F-0n; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:35:50 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2603 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kX4XF-00072J-Ah; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:35:49 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:35:41 +0200 Message-Id: <83blgpf19u.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Luis Machado Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, david.spickett@linaro.org In-Reply-To: <53e13a05-ee8d-063a-fad7-b1fe3b43ad6c@linaro.org> (message from Luis Machado on Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:59:29 -0300) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/24] Documentation for the new mtag commands References: <20201022200014.5189-1-luis.machado@linaro.org> <20201022200014.5189-21-luis.machado@linaro.org> <837drhla9o.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2jwj0dk.fsf@gnu.org> <53e13a05-ee8d-063a-fad7-b1fe3b43ad6c@linaro.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 15:35:51 -0000 > From: Luis Machado > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, david.spickett@linaro.org > Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:59:29 -0300 > > David Spicket (cc-ed, handling LLDB's MTE enablement), has suggested > "mtag withltag" as opposed to "mtag setltag", which implies we will only > display the modified/tagged version of a particular address expression, > without setting any value. > > How does that sound? Better than "setltag", I think.