From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E74A93890433 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 06:08:27 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E74A93890433 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=eliz@gnu.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56873) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jmACQ-0006KK-Et; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 02:08:26 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3756 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jmACP-0000l5-H9; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 02:08:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 09:08:13 +0300 Message-Id: <83bllfziya.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tom Tromey Cc: ludo@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <87d05w15fs.fsf@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Thu, 18 Jun 2020 14:31:51 -0600) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] guile: Add support for Guile 2.2. References: <87wo4bypk6.fsf@gnu.org> <20200615151453.795-1-ludo@gnu.org> <20200615151453.795-2-ludo@gnu.org> <831rmg2ri2.fsf@gnu.org> <87d05w15fs.fsf@tromey.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 06:08:28 -0000 > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: Ludovic Courtès , > gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 14:31:51 -0600 > > >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Eli> I still am not convinced we should remove the description of those > Eli> functions from the manual, but I'll let others speak up if they have > Eli> an opinion. > > When do we plan to remove them? > > Maybe it would be better to leave the docs and say "these will be > removed in gdb 11", then once 10 branches we could go ahead with that. Those were my thoughts, yes. And also to state that they are only available with Guile 2.0. > IIUC maybe they are sometimes needed by Guile 2.0? How long is that > expected to be around? Something for Ludo to answer, I guess.