From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-124183-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 103164 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2015 20:06:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 103143 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jul 2015 20:06:16 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-HELO: mtaout20.012.net.il
Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 20:06:16 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NR600G00QEV7300@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 23:06:14 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NR600GOLQIB3830@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 23:06:14 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 20:06:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Use of create_new_frame from 'frame'.
In-reply-to: <559D7E09.6080202@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: andrew.burgess@embecosm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83bnfmv2hd.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20150708170944.GA17985@embecosm.com> <83io9uv3lb.fsf@gnu.org> <559D7E09.6080202@redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00254.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 20:46:17 +0100
> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> > You could also ask the user for confirmation, when the command is
> > going to create a new frame.
> 
> I'd rather the explicit approach, because querying works when
> in interactive mode, but not with scripts.

We've got the same situation with umpteen other commands, and we also
have a solution for scripts: we implicitly assume a NO answer.

But I'm not going to insist.  I just wanted to remind us that there's
one more alternative.