From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4687 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2013 19:57:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4677 invoked by uid 89); 1 Nov 2013 19:57:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout22.012.net.il Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 19:57:49 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MVL00K00OJ04E00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:57:46 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MVL00JVGOS7ZJ60@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:57:46 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 19:57:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: gdb.texinfo is getting too big In-reply-to: To: Doug Evans Cc: palves@redhat.com, Paul_Koning@dell.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, stan@codesourcery.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83bo23c2tx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ob6rpqa5.fsf@gnu.org> <83mwmbp80v.fsf@gnu.org> <83zjq9nipu.fsf@gnu.org> <525EEE89.9060907@redhat.com> <83txghnfpe.fsf@gnu.org> <525F0783.5000907@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:37:53 -0700 > From: Doug Evans > Cc: Paul Koning , Eli Zaretskii , > gdb-patches , Stan Shebs > > If people are ok with logical grouping units it's fine with me. > One fear I have is a protracted discussion on the groupings. > > I do like the idea of splitting out pieces that are easy to split out. > E.g., RSP, Python, maybe a few others. > > How about starting with that? Go for it.