From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AA86385842F for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:02:45 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 7AA86385842F Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56462) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oAwo1-0007MN-46; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 13:02:45 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4087 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oAwo0-0005ec-55; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 13:02:44 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 20:02:32 +0300 Message-Id: <83czebzion.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: (message from Pedro Alves on Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:54:10 +0100) Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/25] Document remote clone events, and QThreadOptions packet References: <20220620225419.382221-1-pedro@palves.net> <20220620225419.382221-26-pedro@palves.net> <838rpqkyof.fsf@gnu.org> <8ca45d20-55f3-f3b0-82c3-971d54f2e0a3@palves.net> <83k08jzl4d.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:02:46 -0000 > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Pedro Alves > Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:54:10 +0100 > > The text for fork events uses "@var{thread-id}" too, in the > "Refer to @ref{thread-id syntax} for the format of the @var{thread-id} field." > sentence. The new text was just copying that. > > How about this to fix the preexisting issues? LGTM, thanks.