From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 129144 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2019 02:37:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 129136 invoked by uid 89); 8 Aug 2019 02:37:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (209.51.188.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 02:37:28 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55147) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hvYIw-0000NK-GV; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 22:37:26 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2530 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hvYIw-0004Yi-0q; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 22:37:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 02:37:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83d0hgbcwy.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tom Tromey CC: palves@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <87o910ehgf.fsf@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Wed, 07 Aug 2019 16:30:56 -0600) Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] Require readline 7 or newer References: <20190806204334.13441-1-tom@tromey.com> <20190806204334.13441-9-tom@tromey.com> <91cf16b4-343b-1d47-ab5c-c8f2127cd4db@redhat.com> <87o910ehgf.fsf@tromey.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-08/txt/msg00189.txt.bz2 > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 16:30:56 -0600 > > >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: > > Pedro> I'd be much better user experience if this were done at by the > Pedro> build system, at configure time, with AC_TRY_COMPILE, IMO. Something > Pedro> similar to the "GNU regex" check should do it. > > Makes sense. Here's a new patch that addresses this and the NEWS thing. OK for the documentation parts. Thanks.