From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30236 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2016 19:39:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 30154 invoked by uid 89); 27 Sep 2016 19:39:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 19:39:36 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boyDy-0003vR-OG for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:39:34 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41494) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boyDy-0003u9-LH; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:39:30 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2381 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1boyDw-0002kf-TC; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:39:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 19:47:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83d1jpb09b.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tom Tromey CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <87eg45cj5h.fsf@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:06:02 -0600) Subject: Re: [RFA] Small improvements to the remote protocol manual Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <1473819514-18403-1-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> <87h991z41h.fsf@tromey.com> <83oa39b5m8.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg45cj5h.fsf@tromey.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00379.txt.bz2 > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:06:02 -0600 > > There was some minor discussion about questions I had but AFAICT no > requests for changes; so I haven't made any. > > I think dealing with the "A" packet or the notification oddities, if > necessary, can be done in a follow-up. I still don't know what to do > here. OK. Apart of 2 typos ("px@ref", "@var{GDBN}") and the use of @ref instead of @pxref in parentheses, I have no other comments to the patch. Thanks, and sorry for the delay in reviewing.