From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 120497 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2015 07:41:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 120482 invoked by uid 89); 27 Mar 2015 07:41:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout28.012.net.il Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il (HELO mtaout28.012.net.il) (80.179.55.184) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 07:41:20 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NLV00K000U7EV00@mtaout28.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 10:39:57 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NLV00DFA1ALEE80@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 10:39:57 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 07:41:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] compile: New 'compile print' In-reply-to: <20150327073333.GA28529@host1.jankratochvil.net> To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pmuldoon@redhat.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83d23unazo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20150326205727.28223.54648.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20150326205752.28223.24230.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net> <83iodmnc18.fsf@gnu.org> <20150327073333.GA28529@host1.jankratochvil.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg00882.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 08:33:33 +0100 > From: Jan Kratochvil > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pmuldoon@redhat.com > > On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 08:18:43 +0100, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > I suggest a different name for this command. Unfortunately, "eval" is > > already taken, but perhaps "parse" or "parse-eval"? Or maybe a new > > switch to "print"? "compile print" sounds awkward and unintuitive to > > me. > > FYI there is already "compile code" and "compile file". Yes, I know. But this command is different AFAIU: it doesn't compile any code at all. So prefixing it with "compile" doesn't sound right to me.