From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-86858-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 21204 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2012 07:54:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 21186 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jan 2012 07:54:31 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 07:54:14 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LXF00B004KQ8600@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 09:54:00 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.156.26]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LXF0099Z4LZ9NL1@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 09:54:00 +0200 (IST)
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 07:54:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC stub-side break conditions 3/5]  GDB-side changes
In-reply-to: <4F07779A.10808@mentor.com>
To: "Gustavo, Luis" <luis_gustavo@mentor.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83d3awgd7s.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <4F05BA10.3090107@mentor.com> <83y5tlnrsx.fsf@gnu.org> <4F07779A.10808@mentor.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00255.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:37:14 -0200
> From: Luis Machado <luis_gustavo@mentor.com>
> CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> > Btw, what happens if I set the mode to "stub" and the sub does not
> > support this?  Do I get any feedback, and if so, at what time?
> 
> If the target (stub) does not advertise support for condition 
> evaluation, nothing will happen. We will fallback to "gdb" mode 
> automatically.
> 
> Target-side condition evaluation only happens if:
> 
> 1 - Target supports it (via ConditionalBreakpoints feature).
> 2 - breakpoint condition-evaluation is "auto" or "stub".
> 
> There isn't a warning message though.

Should there be some feedback somewhere?