From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5842 invoked by alias); 19 May 2017 14:40:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 5825 invoked by uid 89); 19 May 2017 14:40:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=pay X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 May 2017 14:40:17 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBj4h-0000lV-Kr for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 19 May 2017 10:40:18 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57580) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBj4h-0000lR-HR; Fri, 19 May 2017 10:40:15 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4102 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dBj4g-0007sB-0R; Fri, 19 May 2017 10:40:15 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 14:40:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83efvk3o73.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Pedro Alves CC: brobecker@adacore.com, qiyaoltc@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <4c762118-a6d8-bc15-d317-b117b6949fba@redhat.com> (message from Pedro Alves on Fri, 19 May 2017 14:58:54 +0100) Subject: Re: GDB 7.99.91 MinGW compilation warning in tui.c Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20170504194442.63AAF60B72@joel.gnat.com> <83mvancrze.fsf@gnu.org> <83r2zt89c8.fsf@gnu.org> <86k25f8n5w.fsf@gmail.com> <83a86b5t6f.fsf@gnu.org> <20170517182111.loklx3ex64f5brco@adacore.com> <834lwh46mi.fsf@gnu.org> <421dfd1c-912a-29f2-d051-f95fd66df2ab@redhat.com> <83wp9d2j51.fsf@gnu.org> <20e0a3e8-e626-93b1-68c6-6c42b1365aae@redhat.com> <83k25d2eni.fsf@gnu.org> <4c762118-a6d8-bc15-d317-b117b6949fba@redhat.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg00450.txt.bz2 > Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, qiyaoltc@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Pedro Alves > Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 14:58:54 +0100 > > You seem to assume that someone would take the descriptions you > gave, turn them into actual code, make sure things still compile > on their favorite host plus that it actually fixes what it's supposed > to fix on MinGW, write some ChangeLogs, etc. It's not unheard of. E.g., I do that for Emacs all the time. And the changes are so simple there shouldn't be any doubt about correctness in this case. > So I don't understand the reluctance of posting an actual diff > to gcc-patches. The lack of responses is not exactly encouraging. Would you mind asking them to pay attention?