From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/36] Guile extension language: doc additions
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 07:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83eh4ow78t.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sit4kb1t.fsf@gnu.org>
> From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 22:30:54 +0100
>
> >> +The implementation uses Guile's @code{smob} (small object)
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > This should be in @dfn, as it's new terminology.
>
> Better yet:
>
> (@pxref{Smobs,,, guile, GNU Guile Reference Manual})
Yes, a cross-reference in addition to @dfn is the best.
> However, rather than âdoes not work as expectedâ (which could be
> misleading), what about something like:
>
> âmake-valueâ always returns a fresh object. Therefore,
> @code{<gdb:value>} returned by different calls to âmake-valueâ are
> usually different:
>
> @example
> (eq? (make-value 1) (make-value 1))
> @result{} #f
>
> (equal? (make-value 1) (make-value 1))
> @result{} #t
> @end example
This is better, thanks.
> >> +@defun value? object
>
> What about distinguishing Scheme functions, like:
>
> @deffn {Scheme Procedure} value? object
If it's important (is it?), then yes.
> >> +If @var{type} is not provided,
> >> +a Scheme real is converted to the C @code{double} type for the
> >> +current architecture.
> >
> > Isn't Guile built with libgmp? If so, doesn't it support floats
> > which, when converted to a double, will lose accuracy?
>
> Guile uses GMP, but GMP is for integers (bignums).
What about long double support?
> >> +A Scheme string is converted to a target string, using the current
> >> +target encoding.
> >
> > What if target encoding doesn't support some of the characters in the
> > string?
>
> Guileâs behavior can be controlled with
> â%default-port-conversion-strategyâ: it can raise an exception, or
> substitute any characters that could not be converted, or escape them
> (info "(guile) Ports").
>
> Perhaps this should be briefly mentioned, with a cross-ref.
It should, because the issue will certainly arise, especially since
(AFAIU) Guile prefers UTF-8.
> >> +The optional @var{errors} argument is either @code{"strict"}
> >> +or @code{"replace"}. A value of @code{"strict"} corresponds to
> >> +Guile's @code{SCM_FAILED_CONVERSION_ERROR} and a value of @code{"replace"}
> >> +corresponds to Guile's @code{SCM_FAILED_CONVERSION_QUESTION_MARK}.
> >
> > Suggest a cross-reference to Guile documentation here.
>
> Agreed. Also, Guile talks of âconversion strategyâ and âconversion
> error handlerâ, with values âerrorâ, âsubstituteâ, and âescapeâ (at the
> Scheme level), and Iâd recommend sticking to those names and terminology.
Right.
> >> +If the optional @var{length} argument is given, the string will be
> >> +fetched and encoded to the length of characters specified. If
> >> +the @var{length} argument is not provided, the string will be fetched
> >> +and encoded until a null of appropriate width is found.
> >
> > Isn't this null termination description skewed towards C-like
> > languages? Aren't there languages where strings don't have to be
> > null-terminated?
>
> Yes, and thatâs when LENGTH should be provided, AIUI.
Then I guess the above should say that explicitly. But it would be
nice if GDB could support strings in languages that don't
null-terminate even without LENGTH.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-04 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-24 19:03 Doug Evans
2013-12-25 19:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-03 21:31 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-04 7:12 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2014-01-04 11:57 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-04 14:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-04 17:42 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-04 20:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-16 4:20 ` Doug Evans
2014-01-18 20:36 ` Doug Evans
2014-01-18 20:52 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-18 20:55 ` Doug Evans
2014-01-19 16:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-19 17:19 ` Doug Evans
2014-01-19 17:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-19 17:53 ` Doug Evans
2014-01-19 18:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-19 21:19 ` Doug Evans
2014-01-18 20:16 ` Doug Evans
2014-01-18 20:42 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-18 21:57 ` Doug Evans
2014-01-19 14:46 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-19 21:37 ` Doug Evans
2014-01-19 22:50 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-18 22:32 ` Doug Evans
2014-01-19 14:47 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-19 15:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-19 16:13 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-19 17:05 ` Doug Evans
2014-01-18 20:06 ` Doug Evans
2014-01-18 20:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-18 20:53 ` Doug Evans
2014-01-19 16:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-19 17:42 ` Doug Evans
2014-01-19 21:01 ` Doug Evans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83eh4ow78t.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).