From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27805 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2014 19:47:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 27794 invoked by uid 89); 21 Nov 2014 19:47:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout28.012.net.il Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il (HELO mtaout28.012.net.il) (80.179.55.184) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:47:01 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NFE00G00MS5Z700@mtaout28.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 21:44:25 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NFE009ITMU1J560@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 21:44:25 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:47:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/14] the "compile" command In-reply-to: <20141121184132.GA8400@host2.jankratochvil.net> To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83fvdctjyi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20141101214552.13230.45564.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20141101214733.13230.49968.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net> <8361exy4if.fsf@gnu.org> <20141120212406.GA23190@host2.jankratochvil.net> <8361e956jd.fsf@gnu.org> <20141121184132.GA8400@host2.jankratochvil.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg00531.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:41:32 +0100 > From: Jan Kratochvil > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > Then maybe we need to tell what "persistent" means in this context. > > Something like "visible to the rest of the program for the duration of > > this run". > > I find this was said by "and only exist as long as the injected object code > exists.". But I have therefore changed the sentence to: > Variables and types that are created as part of the @code{compile} > command are not visible to the rest of the program for the duration of > this run. > > BTW I would say s/this run/its run/. That's also fine. > > OK, then let's say so explicitly. Something like > > > > Types defined in the @code{compile} will no longer be available in > > the next @code{compile} command. > > I used it as you wrote. Although I would write: > Types defined in the @code{compile} command will no longer be > available in the next @code{compile} command. That'd be fine as well. I think the patch can go in now. Thanks.