From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30191 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2014 21:11:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 30180 invoked by uid 89); 18 Dec 2014 21:11:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout22.012.net.il Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 21:11:23 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NGS00800QATHD00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 23:11:20 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NGS008NRQUWIX00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 23:11:20 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 21:11:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [patch] compile: rm -rf -> ftw()+rmdir()+unlink() [Re: [patch] compile: Fix MinGW build] In-reply-to: <20141218210445.GA23134@host2.jankratochvil.net> To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: palves@redhat.com, ktietz@redhat.com, sellcey@imgtec.com, brobecker@adacore.com, yao@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83h9wsu0i3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20141217210144.GA26674@host2.jankratochvil.net> <549206B1.40902@redhat.com> <20141218181432.GA19996@host2.jankratochvil.net> <54931BBB.3080304@redhat.com> <20141218184123.GA20422@host2.jankratochvil.net> <549325FB.9040705@redhat.com> <20141218210445.GA23134@host2.jankratochvil.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00554.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:04:45 +0100 > From: Jan Kratochvil > Cc: Kai Tietz , Steve Ellcey , > Eli Zaretskii , brobecker@adacore.com, > yao@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > I am just trying to show (for many years) despite contributor's best effort > (*) the current GDB project's maintenance requires multiple reimplementations > of patches until everyone approves the patch as all the requirements are > nowhere written and the maintainers only show their requirements one after > another after each of the patch variant is submitted. This leads to the slow > development of GDB despite a lot of time invested into it. If this is a problem, how about writing down the requirements?