From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EEBE3858C52 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 20:04:55 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 4EEBE3858C52 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 4EEBE3858C52 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:470:142:3::10 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1702670697; cv=none; b=VPPiFPKw3wpB5A/KKrq6JR8ziL2GCk6LvQY1T+eG4AIzqmX1hfDWIjQh6ji6eldrEtW+uOA8U80aFealAWC5vSGu0eQvSaHhUbZZH72ojKEs5bW9UxUKOGiqLzn9nnduG65QzqwjiP/Dh1rS3Pb0+wa0gQymOL1MawCl4+8InZo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1702670697; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3h5a1JguT+lVIV6GX5PVN1Mq6AKCzW/Mb8GLLOtpgxg=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Subject; b=BBMbyN/5fU3p67OIgTTOI2NWdmWM/Zrxzvw+mJzFIhB3PN5KijSPN1NDZgQN3pZsFTv0do1QSVn5sq5Ry0sZAsaj2TY+llyUeDoTAOh4sP10KUxD2GXrpMjZeA7KNm4jlYDvbywaoWtHS0S+9sjgxq0g5iO5FbhhrZfrVQYpHbs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rEEQY-0005sS-Id; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 15:04:54 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=pNEbpumtaSyyHUF5+BVrIDnxWs+tBrBlzm4MJtP1Rqo=; b=Y5DPdgZ4gVWo QvbbrxlbqYk8AwgygDJY8jyfSZT8CQJCC++8fo25Q8lkoGPTnA/WEO2AMKjm7tihVMh1JG8sQrmEy M7nVASCnJizCmEGHH4l5X2F4iz+XKkqVS88PSdIEeRTyMXMZ/9kRbh9bA2Pj7zOuhdUzLxJoUbaoZ KtFOlC7QTpwDkMNFcYMoAaAS3NCs6wLIzS10XaDXXqe90QBsDme8RNwcpkPb2T+qrtsFifWXKgAbS XxMyR8DdpS8bOXphbJuvOtQs7x8Em/SuxiIvVrMCaFvXyHeI6C1ZF6kCPUC34fuoKCL3BvGq8HKl8 sJarQgDrMgWNOq8dfzaInw==; Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 22:04:43 +0200 Message-Id: <83il4znsf8.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, tdevries@suse.de In-Reply-To: <87jzpf5jpt.fsf@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Fri, 15 Dec 2023 12:50:06 -0700) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] [gdb/tui] Add tui border-kind active-ascii References: <20230508141036.22723-1-tdevries@suse.de> <20230508141036.22723-4-tdevries@suse.de> <87jzpf5jpt.fsf@tromey.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: Tom de Vries , Tom Tromey > Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 12:50:06 -0700 > > >>>>> "Tom" == Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches writes: > > Tom> Add a new border-kind active-ascii, that's like border-kind ascii for inactive > Tom> windows but uses '+' as hline and vline (instead of '-' and '|') for an active > Tom> window. > > I'm fine with this if you still want to do it. > Personally I'm more interested in whether we can make the TUI look > "sleek and modern" but this sort of thing is fine too. > > It may still need a doc review? Not sure. The documentation part is basically trivial. It's okay by me. Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii