From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 83303 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2018 02:42:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 82894 invoked by uid 89); 23 Aug 2018 02:42:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 02:42:46 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fsfa4-0001tk-L1 for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 22:42:43 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50396) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fsfa4-0001te-Hn; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 22:42:40 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1665 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fsfa4-0002ry-54; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 22:42:40 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 02:42:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83in41by7h.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Simon Marchi CC: simon.marchi@polymtl.ca, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <8284ef0e-7f4b-b29e-0a55-2342ad261632@ericsson.com> (message from Simon Marchi on Wed, 22 Aug 2018 20:03:05 -0400) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle dprintf argument evaluation errors better (PR gdb/16551) References: <1528920116-26170-1-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> <8284ef0e-7f4b-b29e-0a55-2342ad261632@ericsson.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-08/txt/msg00560.txt.bz2 > CC: , Eli Zaretskii > From: Simon Marchi > Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 20:03:05 -0400 > > Eli, would it be possible to take a look at least at the NEWS/doc part of this patch? If > there are no comments on the behavior change, I would be ready to merge this patch, but > I'd like to make sure that NEWS/doc is ok first. Sorry I missed that: the documentation parts are OK. Thanks.