From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eliz@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2745B3850435
 for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Thu,  2 Jun 2022 16:37:14 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 2745B3850435
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34938)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1nwnou-0004wI-Tk; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 12:37:13 -0400
Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4862 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1nwnoo-00028D-Bi; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 12:37:07 -0400
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 19:37:15 +0300
Message-Id: <83leufdnt0.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-Reply-To: <3b5161b4-9fcb-193b-d5ef-7762eac850f0@palves.net> (message from
 Pedro Alves on Thu, 2 Jun 2022 14:44:31 +0100)
Subject: Re: RTe: Location Specs (Was: [pushed v5] gdb/manual: Introduce
 location specs)
References: <20220526194250.2310460-1-pedro@palves.net>
 <838rqmm7gb.fsf@gnu.org> <6914f754-4e33-5aa1-4ea6-dca9504e8bfe@palves.net>
 <83wne0fgmd.fsf@gnu.org> <e9d2ec35-a68a-7403-ab88-ebfe9d88ca37@palves.net>
 <834k13ffpf.fsf@gnu.org> <5eb11c4f-a35a-79fa-cc67-0428dc88134a@palves.net>
 <83wndzdy08.fsf@gnu.org> <3b5161b4-9fcb-193b-d5ef-7762eac850f0@palves.net>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF,
 RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/gdb-patches>,
 <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/gdb-patches>,
 <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 16:37:15 -0000

> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 14:44:31 +0100
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
> 
> > OK, how about this instead?
> > 
> >   Several @value{GDBN} commands accept arguments that specify a location
> >   or locations of your program's code.  Many times locations are
> >   specified using a source line number, but they can also be specified
> >   by a function name, an address, a label, etc.  The different
> >   forms of specifying a location that @value{GDBN} recognizes are
> >   collectively known as forms of @dfn{location specification}, or
> >   @dfn{location spec}.  This section documents the forms of specifying
> >   locations that @value{GDBN} recognizes.
> 
> Perfect.
> 
> > 
> >>>>>  For a C@t{++} constructor, the @value{NGCC} compiler generates several
> >>>>> -instances of the function body, used in different cases.
> >>>>> +instances of the function body, used in different cases, but their
> >>>>> +source-level names are identical, unless you qualify them.
> >>>>
> >>>> What do you mean by "qualify" here?
> >>>
> >>> The "fully-qualified and prototyped function" part.
> >>
> >> That's unrelated to what is being alluded to here.
> > 
> > OK, I will drop the "unless you qualify them" part.
> 
> Sounds good.

Thanks, I made those changes and pushed.