From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A8C73858426 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 17:03:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 3A8C73858426 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=33870 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHqNW-0004a6-OE; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 12:03:42 -0500 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2294 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHqNW-00089Y-4B; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 12:03:38 -0500 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 19:03:29 +0200 Message-Id: <83leykug4e.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrew Burgess Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <87pmnwxdf9.fsf@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Burgess on Wed, 09 Feb 2022 15:33:30 +0000) Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 05/15] gdb/tui: add new 'tui window width' command and 'winwidth' alias References: <81ab0df3eebc4d865d9e63e49a1eab84e7970a6a.1644156219.git.aburgess@redhat.com> <837da8youb.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmnwxdf9.fsf@redhat.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 17:03:44 -0000 > From: Andrew Burgess > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 15:33:30 +0000 > > > Btw, should we mention that this new command will only have effect if > > more than one window is displayed? > > What about this for the description of 'tui window width'? The second > paragraph is new: It's fine, thanks. > If this is OK, then I would propose adding the same paragraph to the > description of 'tui window height' which obviously has the same > restrictions. Right.