Re: RFA: info macro [-at LOCATION,]

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: David Taylor <dtaylor@emc.com>
> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:41:33 -0500
> 
> A few releases ago it was possible to set a location that would be used
> by 'info location' by typing something like:
> 
>     list file.c:42
> 
> and then do:
> 
>     info macro MACRONAME
> 
> .  Sometime between release 7.1 and 7.8 that stopped working.
> 
> The following patch adds the option [-at LOCATION,] to 'info macro' to
> enable the use of a user selected location as a documented feature.
> 
> Three files, three change log entries:

Thanks.  I think this warrants a NEWS entry as well.

> gdb/doc/ChangeLog:
> 
> 2014-11-10  David Taylor  <dtaylor@emc.com>
> 
> 	* gdb.texinfo: Document new -at LOCATION option of the 'info
> 	macro' command.

Please state the node in which the change was made (as if it were a
function, i.e. in parentheses).

> -@item info macro [-a|-all] [--] @var{macro}
> +@item info macro [-a|-all] [-at LOCATION,] [--] @var{macro}
>  Show the current definition or all definitions of the named @var{macro},
>  and describe the source location or compiler command-line where that
>  definition was established.  The optional double dash is to signify the end of
>  argument processing and the beginning of @var{macro} for non C-like macros where
> -the macro may begin with a hyphen.
> +the macro may begin with a hyphen.  If the optional LOCATION is specified,
> +it is used instead of the current location.

First, "LOCATION" should be "@var{location}", as it is a parameter,
not a literal string.

And second, "it is used instead of the current location" leaves too
much unsaid.  The reader will wonder why does location matter for this
purpose.  I suggest to make that explicit in the text.