From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=r66Z=5C=gnu.org=eliz@sourceware.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4A7D3858D28
	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Thu,  5 Jan 2023 15:12:09 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org A4A7D3858D28
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1pDRuZ-0004DP-L4; Thu, 05 Jan 2023 10:12:07 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
	s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
	mime-version; bh=hwdUw2Li0Rv9BRDOgXs9U20kZrxbHaJ1/VNcdAEu+XQ=; b=pXGaMlVTFqkK
	axH96U/QD9oXhzWRjqgSxE7mbJS9/A/zxNMsBQ+OtYWHjyr81FlxNvJyEhUHRwOKdgRI+seFs0Mf9
	CeEUdpDanOdp8dHNB4bv6IQW6BxnRS/L/BaT05Q5D7l3zr/WatshRHf57RYmNCw/o0yUbzWTdV4gA
	/WESTbuDbbwrhfPPlho7sKa9gza4qlNDxj8k51Z68vMLoaioGusHahb+o/SZMVOZc4fJYU+++jAq6
	BqdH9PiANSOcISutM6I7HHZU4sIzL0y8d7ImKiLPhotWKr84SYHmNA5rbkl7W/kwZLH/uKYTi2as5
	sgoylFWFEmQH4nivZ9e00w==;
Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1pDRuX-0006ZZ-IM; Thu, 05 Jan 2023 10:12:06 -0500
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2023 17:12:20 +0200
Message-Id: <83o7rdvwvf.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
Cc: tom@tromey.com, simark@simark.ca, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
	luis.machado@arm.com
In-Reply-To:
	<CAPTJ0XHQJBr5XKFiVdEq7SDSnwG99=BSHraJvK1vhcBy59ZtXA@mail.gmail.com>
	(message from Christian Biesinger on Thu, 5 Jan 2023 09:49:14 -0500)
Subject: Re: Two observations using GDB 13 snapshot
References: <83h6xugc5v.fsf@gnu.org> <835ye7e9jw.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87h6xrks77.fsf@tromey.com> <83mt7idacj.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsd4elb2.fsf@tromey.com>
 <83o7rs4qmg.fsf@gnu.org> <87cz84dasj.fsf@tromey.com> <835ydw20bw.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87wn6bbi5m.fsf@tromey.com> <83sfgz8m9i.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7rnb0ya.fsf@tromey.com>
 <83a6368chf.fsf@gnu.org> <87k02aaxc8.fsf@tromey.com> <83wn6a6n21.fsf@gnu.org>
 <587b899f-0f93-530a-7313-d4e1f9e501b9@simark.ca> <835ydt6jzw.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAPTJ0XGfDpAALz05-DsBsxCzkW1t+X==SEyGFWK9JmxW8VFx+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <83wn63z81w.fsf@gnu.org> <CAPTJ0XFrGDgJ6nFUmF+dg9uEy+Xt17g35Pnhwr2EcMHwD1q4Yw@mail.gmail.com>
 <46d7fd4b-d5f0-0007-3e88-20345e0e0584@simark.ca> <831qoayxuu.fsf@gnu.org>
 <878rii9bg3.fsf@tromey.com> <83fscpxxom.fsf@gnu.org> <CAPTJ0XHQJBr5XKFiVdEq7SDSnwG99=BSHraJvK1vhcBy59ZtXA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>

> From: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 09:49:14 -0500
> Cc: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>, simark@simark.ca, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, 
> 	luis.machado@arm.com
> 
> > If it's okay for GDB to compare case-insensitively only ASCII
> > characters, then is the above patch mature enough to go to the gdb-13
> > branch?
> 
> If https://itanium-cxx-abi.github.io/cxx-abi/abi.html#mangle.name is
> up-to-date (?), then
> "This ABI does not yet specify a mangling for identifiers containing
> characters outside of _A-Za-z0-9."
> 
> On the other hand, if
> https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2603-rust-symbol-name-mangling-v0.html#punycode-vs-utf-8
> is to be believed, GCC/Clang/MSVC do use UTF-8 for symbol names. But I
> don't think strcasecmp on Windows uses UTF-8?

No, I think Windows would use UTF-16 instead.