From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 71773 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2016 18:14:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 71691 invoked by uid 89); 10 Feb 2016 18:14:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:1322, HX-Received-From:134, HX-Received-From:4830, HX-Received-From:2001 X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:14:00 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTZGz-0006Vk-M3 for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:13:58 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:40665) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTZGz-0006Vg-Jk; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:13:53 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2832 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aTZGy-00074F-0V; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:13:52 -0500 Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:14:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83oaboa0x5.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tsutomu Seki CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (message from Tsutomu Seki on Wed, 10 Feb 2016 20:43:40 +0900) Subject: Re: [PATCH] supports IPv6 only remote target Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <831t8ldc80.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00313.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 20:43:40 +0900 > From: Tsutomu Seki > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > Changed address to be "@code{fe80::1%eth1}", to include scope id > as written later. > > > This example seems to imply that more than just taking brackets > > is required. > > Your are right. This implies address/port separation rule and > address/scope separation rule. The former should be documented, > because address/port separation is done by the application before > passing them to getaddrinfo. > > > Should we tell more about that? > > On the other hand, the latter is difficult to document (for me) in > generic manner, because %-style scope-id notation depends on > implementation of getaddrinfo. I think what you did is good enough, thanks. > > I think this will break the build with mingw.org's MinGW. It doesn't > > have wspiapi.h, AFAIK. What exactly is needed from that header? > > It is needed to support getaddrinfo() on Windows 2000 and older versions. > > What can I do for it? The easiest solution is to replace with , > but Windows 2000 support (as a host) would be dropped. Is it feasible to copy the necessary bits from that header, i.e. have the prototype in ser-tcp.c (or in some suitable GDB header file)? Thanks.