From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4956 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2013 10:01:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4938 invoked by uid 89); 25 Oct 2013 10:01:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout20.012.net.il Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:01:00 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MV700K00Y1IYH00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:00:58 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MV700KIWYHJYB30@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:00:56 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:01:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] set/show code-cache NEWS and doc In-reply-to: <526A3B07.1020607@codesourcery.com> To: Yao Qi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83ob6dhdpt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1382516855-32218-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1382516855-32218-6-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <83sivshuux.fsf@gnu.org> <5268D967.2000703@codesourcery.com> <837gd2itkj.fsf@gnu.org> <526A3B07.1020607@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00791.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:33:59 +0800 > From: Yao Qi > CC: > > On 10/24/2013 11:20 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > The problem in this case is that it's unclear whether you are talking > > about accessing the source code or the code (a.k.a. ".text") section > > of the executable. "Program code" could mean either of these two. > > How about "executable code"? I would suggest "code section", unless you think that is incorrect for some reason.