From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4451A3858D35 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 19:35:24 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 4451A3858D35 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pEEyR-0001rR-70; Sat, 07 Jan 2023 14:35:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=+dKTUEoDcr21h8eVZsS/vNYLQgwnN8IQUqHJEzg1M4w=; b=YxXFdJn2tvXY u4r7QsEdi0HAiXCARH+cuUX6cs8gbaAjnS+/GbxjdoxQcTMp/JC7TNMxHoICTiQrXUW7Cc/v3Q2mv B17OLuP72zv6UmHdlLEDL8VafrAbS9I+P5frIyQuKm0zA9M8X8TZTCGT+c/z3PG0TFLdKmeOJ/tuH X35gbj2bdc0NyFk9c39NG8lzbn0vprn5KUR/P6o29FR672BCkR7HOZ40H2cf4OOmfwJjEwpp1NJ6P a4pNzeJn0oLESbIg2paCpb8uLAAxjlxJhv7SpSWoTLPLelxDm+VooxR/G/st0epp3qi8p2oWvyJ3Z E1BDRFy1v4NpH1Lq0dGAHg==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pEEyQ-000477-Jo; Sat, 07 Jan 2023 14:35:22 -0500 Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2023 21:35:43 +0200 Message-Id: <83pmbqqgs0.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andreas Schwab Cc: ssbssa@yahoo.de, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <87sfgmdu3t.fsf@igel.home> (message from Andreas Schwab on Sat, 07 Jan 2023 20:26:14 +0100) Subject: Re: Two observations using GDB 13 snapshot References: <83h6xugc5v.fsf@gnu.org> <83r0w6uaad.fsf@gnu.org> <87fscmemeo.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83358mu1tv.fsf@gnu.org> <87bknaek9z.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83v8lisjlx.fsf@gnu.org> <87lemeh4wz.fsf@igel.home> <83h6x2sb5x.fsf@gnu.org> <87cz7qh2db.fsf@igel.home> <83a62usabj.fsf@gnu.org> <878rieh194.fsf@igel.home> <838ries9je.fsf@gnu.org> <874jt2h0hq.fsf@igel.home> <835ydis7qt.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgaufj4w.fsf@igel.home> <83zgauqqa5.fsf@gnu.org> <1151933072.13100631.1673108176724@mail.yahoo.com> <87mt6ufdle.fsf@igel.home> <83tu12qkt4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a62ufbf2.fsf@igel.home> <83r0w6qjf4.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfgmdu3t.fsf@igel.home> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: ssbssa@yahoo.de, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2023 20:26:14 +0100 > > On Jan 07 2023, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> >> > Isn't --enable-shared the default? > >> >> > >> >> No. > >> > > >> > gdb/libtool thinks shared libraries should be built: > >> > >> bfd/libtool and opcodes/libtool don't. > > > > But the issue at hand is about what happens in gdb/, not in bfd or > > opcodes. > > Only bfd and opcodes build possibly shared libraries, and only that will > have an affect on the necessity to build a gdb libtool wrapper. > > >> As you already discovered, gdb/libtool is not used for building > >> libraries at all. > > > > So you are saying it's a bug in gdb/configure? > > No. Then I'm afraid I don't understand what you are saying.