From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 615473858025 for ; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 18:06:06 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 615473858025 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55930) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpx9x-0003aw-4e; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 14:06:05 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1632 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpx9w-0007mw-Mr; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 14:06:05 -0400 Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 21:06:02 +0300 Message-Id: <83pmwyhnqt.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Philippe Waroquiers Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20210606143927.29069-1-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> (message from Philippe Waroquiers via Gdb-patches on Sun, 6 Jun 2021 16:39:27 +0200) Subject: Re: [RFC] Fix/complete option list/description in manual and in gdb --help. References: <20210606143927.29069-1-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 18:06:07 -0000 > Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2021 16:39:27 +0200 > From: Philippe Waroquiers via Gdb-patches > > I am more used to the --long-option convention. > => should the user manual be changed to consistently document and use > --long-option ? Yes, IMO. And in any case, we shouldn't use both -foo and --foo for the same option, that is just counter-productive. > (and just mention the alternative accepted conventions?) I wouldn't, FWIW.