From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 43036 invoked by alias); 13 May 2015 16:40:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 43014 invoked by uid 89); 13 May 2015 16:40:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout25.012.net.il Received: from mtaout25.012.net.il (HELO mtaout25.012.net.il) (80.179.55.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 May 2015 16:40:29 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout25.012.net.il by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NOA00100R6T1T00@mtaout25.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 13 May 2015 19:36:12 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NOA001OARGB7V10@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Wed, 13 May 2015 19:36:12 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 16:40:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] Update documentation on catching a group of related syscalls. In-reply-to: <555327A4.7070408@redhat.com> To: Pedro Alves Cc: gabriel@krisman.be, sergiodj@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, dje@google.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83pp64jurw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wq0gtfxu.fsf@redhat.com> <1431304069-19647-1-git-send-email-gabriel@krisman.be> <1431304069-19647-6-git-send-email-gabriel@krisman.be> <874mnkhrpw.fsf@krisman.be> <555327A4.7070408@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00321.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 11:29:56 +0100 > From: Pedro Alves > CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, dje@google.com > > > Sorry, I sent the documentation patch again. Please, ignore this one, > > Eli already approved it twice. :) > > Generally, personally, in such cases, I prefer that an already approved patch > is included in the series. I don't mind, but please do tell that it was already approved. Thanks.