From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-75254-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5647 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2010 20:43:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 5637 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Aug 2010 20:43:16 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il (HELO mtaout23.012.net.il) (80.179.55.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:43:11 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L7Z00100G41UK00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:42:52 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.202.93]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L7Z001VUG7CPE30@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:42:52 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:43:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: RFA: fix PR python/11792
In-reply-to: <m3pqwzj1cf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83pqwzkeyi.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m3zkwdozop.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <m3y6boj7y8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83sk1wj6tq.fsf@gnu.org> <m3pqwzj1cf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00536.txt.bz2

> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:24:16 -0600
> 
> >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> Eli> Sorry.  The docs patch is okay, but I wonder whether we should say
> Eli> something about what happens when the language is not C++.
> 
> The current language doesn't matter; all that matters is whether the
> object has the needed run-time type information.

Then IMO the text should be rephrased, because it currently sounds
like this feature needs C++.  Perhaps use C++ just "for example" or
something.