From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEAC4385BF9E for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 00:01:21 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org DEAC4385BF9E Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39228) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqPBJ-0006bN-G0; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 20:01:21 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1656 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqGIK-00042l-1t; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 10:32:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 17:31:54 +0300 Message-Id: <83sg1tg2zp.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <87k0n5n47d.fsf@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Mon, 07 Jun 2021 08:23:50 -0600) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gnulib: import chown References: <20210529172510.16285-1-vapier@gentoo.org> <87k0n5n47d.fsf@tromey.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 00:01:37 -0000 > From: Tom Tromey > Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 08:23:50 -0600 > > >>>>> "Mike" == Mike Frysinger via Gdb-patches writes: > > Mike> A few sims use this to emulate chown syscalls. > > Looks good. AFAICT, the Gnulib emulation always returns a failure status in the MinGW port, is that okay for the callers of chown? Perhaps a better alternative is to silently do nothing on MS-Windows?